Employees Aren’t Leaving for More Pay—They’re Leaving for Better Access

You've seen it happen. Your customer service specialist—the one who knows every client by name and can resolve escalations in her sleep—hands in her resignation. She's leaving for a ₱3,000 monthly increase at a competitor. Your department head tries to counter-offer, but she's already made up her mind. Two weeks later, she's gone. Now you're facing angry clients, a backlog of unresolved tickets, and six months before a replacement reaches her level of competence.

What's really happening here? According to WTW's 2023 survey, voluntary turnover in the Philippines hit 15.9%, up from 14.2% the year before. That's nearly one in six employees walking out the door by choice. When asked why, 67% cite pay dissatisfaction as their primary reason for leaving. Meanwhile, nearly half of Filipino workers are actively job-hunting or open to new opportunities—constantly scanning for something better.

On the surface, it looks like a straightforward wage problem. Pay people more, and they'll stay. But here's what's really going on: when employees say they're leaving for "better pay," they often mean "better financial access" or "better flexibility." The issue isn't always about earning more—it's about accessing what they've already earned when they actually need it.

The Real Problem Isn't Salary—It's Timing

Let's talk about something most employers take for granted: the bi-monthly payroll system. Employees get paid on the 15th and 30th. It's standard. It's how things have always been done. But for many Filipino workers, this rigid schedule creates a fundamental mismatch between when money arrives and when life demands it.

The financial reality:

• Only 20% of Filipino adults have emergency funds covering 3+ months of expenses
• 41% borrow money just to cover regular spending needs—not emergencies, regular expenses
• When unexpected costs hit, only 28% can rely on savings while the rest scramble for alternatives

Picture this: It's the 10th of the month. Your mid-level analyst's laptop breaks down and needs ₱15,000 for repairs—essential for remote work. Payday is still five days away. Or it's the 22nd, and your project coordinator has a family emergency requiring ₱8,000. Payday is eight days out. Or your technical support specialist needs to pay enrollment fees for their master's degree on the 18th, but they're three days short of their next paycheck.

What happens next? They borrow. Maybe from a colleague. Maybe from a lending app with fees that compound weekly. One unexpected expense becomes a cascade: borrow to cover the gap, pay high interest, fall behind on other bills, borrow again to catch up.

This isn't about employees being irresponsible. It's about payroll system design that hasn't kept pace with how financial stress actually works. Life doesn't wait for payday—medical emergencies, equipment failures, educational expenses, and family obligations operate on their own timeline, not your payroll calendar.

Why "Better Pay" Often Means "Better Access"

Let's look at three actual job offers a marketing coordinator recently considered:

Most employers assume she'd choose Company B—it pays ₱3,000 more monthly. But increasingly, candidates are choosing Company C. Why? Because flexibility has become the new premium.

According to recent research from the International Labour Organization, 46% of employees in Southeast Asia said they would actively seek employers offering Earned Wage Access (EWA) when looking for their next job. That's nearly half the workforce treating financial flexibility as a deciding factor—not just a nice-to-have, but a competitive differentiator.

Think about what this means: when two employers offer similar salaries, the one that gives employees control over when they access their earnings wins. When one employer pays ₱3,000 more but maintains rigid payroll cycles while another pays slightly less but offers financial flexibility, the rigid employer starts losing talent.

The message is clear: companies that treat payday as a fixed event twice monthly are competing against companies that treat pay access as a continuous employee benefit.

The Hidden Costs of Ignoring This Shift

Now let's talk about what this voluntary turnover wave is actually costing your business. According to PenBrothers, replacing a single employee in the Philippines costs between ₱8,000 and ₱15,000. That includes recruitment and screening costs, interview time, training and onboarding, and lost productivity during the 6-8 weeks it takes for someone new to reach full performance.

Let's do the math for a mid-sized operation. Say you run a business with 100 employees. At a 15.9% annual voluntary turnover rate, you're replacing roughly 16 people every year. At an average replacement cost of ₱12,000 per employee, that's ₱192,000 annually just in direct replacement costs.

But the real cost goes far deeper. When you lose someone with institutional knowledge—someone who knows your systems, your customers, your quirks—you don't just lose a body. You lose efficiency. You lose consistency. You lose the unwritten knowledge that makes operations actually work.

And here's the part most employers underestimate: when one person leaves, others start wondering if they should too. Turnover becomes contagious. High turnover means constant disruption, experienced staff spending more time training newcomers than doing their actual jobs, and customer service suffering because new hires don't know the details yet.

Every ₱192,000 you're spending on turnover could have been invested in financial wellness infrastructure that prevents those departures in the first place.

What Forward-Thinking Employers Are Doing Differently

Some Philippine employers are already redesigning how financial benefits work. Three modern approaches are gaining traction:

1. Earned Wage Access (EWA)
Employees access a portion of their already-earned wages before the official payday. It's not a loan, not an advance, and not debt—it's their own money that they've already worked for. No interest, no rigid repayment schedules, just flexibility when they need it most.

2. Financial wellness programs
Education and tools that help employees manage money better, plan for emergencies, and reduce financial stress.

3. Flexible payroll cycles
Moving beyond the rigid 15th-and-30th model to give employees more control over when they receive what they've earned.

These aren't expensive perks—they're operational upgrades. They cost significantly less than the turnover they prevent, and the business outcomes are measurable.

Real results from EWA implementation:

• 50% reduction in voluntary turnover among companies offering EWA
• 74% decrease in absenteeism when employees have financial flexibility
• 41% of EWA users report improved relationships with their employers

Companies implementing EWA are seeing tangible results. Employees gain immediate access to their earned wages when they need it most, while employers benefit from improved retention and reduced administrative burden.

Evaluating EWA Solutions for Your Business

When considering earned wage access, look for solutions that offer:

• Zero or minimal employer costs – Sustainable programs don't drain HR budgets
• Simple integration – Should work alongside your existing payroll system without major overhauls
• Employee-friendly terms – Low or no interest rates, transparent fees, quick access
• Proven results – Track record of reducing turnover and improving employee satisfaction
• Secure and private – Employees manage their financial needs with dignity

GetPaid x PayMongo is one such solution designed specifically for Filipino businesses. It offers same-day salary access with 0% interest rates, zero employer fees, and integrates seamlessly with existing payroll systems. Employees access their earned wages within 12 hours through a simple app interface, with complete privacy and security.

The financial impact can be significant. On a team of 100 people, reducing turnover from 16 to 8 replacements annually saves ₱96,000 in direct costs alone—not counting gains in productivity, morale, and operational stability.

Rethinking the Question

The real question isn't "How much should we pay?" It's "How can we give employees better control over what they've already earned?"

When employees leave for ₱3,000 more, they're often not just chasing money—they're escaping financial inflexibility. They're moving toward employers who understand that payday shouldn't be a fixed event twice a month but a continuous benefit employees can access when life actually demands it.

This shift addresses three critical areas: retention (employees stay longer when they feel financially supported), productivity (less financial stress means better focus at work), and satisfaction (employees who feel their employer understands their needs are more engaged).

Taking Action

Your employees are already asking for this. Your competitors may already be offering this. Here's how to start:

1. Assess your current turnover costs – Calculate what you're actually spending on replacement and lost productivity
2. Evaluate EWA implementation – Consider how earned wage access could integrate with your existing systems
3. Run a pilot program – Test with one department or location before full rollout
4. Measure the results – Track turnover rates, absenteeism, and employee feedback
5. Scale what works – Expand successful programs across your organization

Financial flexibility isn't a luxury benefit anymore. In today's competitive talent market, it's becoming table stakes. The question isn't whether to explore these solutions—it's whether you'll do it now or after you've already lost more good people.

To learn more about implementing Earned Wage Access for your business, visit landing.paymongo.com/getpaid-ewa-paymongo to see how GetPaid can help you reduce turnover and support your team's financial wellness.

‍